Breathability of Strawbale Walls
Dr. Owen Geiger, Ph.D.( in Social and Economic Development,) is the former Director of Builders Without Borders and current member of the BWB Steering Committee. Dr. Geiger is Founder and Director of the Geiger Research Institute of Sustainable Building (www.grisb.org). He is an author, engineer and licensed contractor specializing in strawbale construction and other types of sustainable building. He co-authored the Builders Without Borders Straw-Bale Construction Guides and contributed to Building Without Borders: Sustainable Construction for the Global Village. Dr. Geiger has consulted on numerous international housing projects, worked closely with Habitat for Humanity for seven years and mentored housing officials with the United Nations Institute of Training and Research. He is also a correspondent for The Last Straw Journal. Dr. Geiger's Global Straw-Bale Construction Certification Program provides high quality strawbale training via a unique program that combines hands-on experiences with research and assignments; this is a distance learning program for those within reach of the internet and with an adequate knowledge of English. See www.grisb.org for more information.
Q: I would like to build a straw bale house. I have not decided yet if the walls will be load bearing or not. However, I would like to have vinyl siding on the exterior and sheet rock the interior. I like the insulation value of the straw but I don't care for the adobe look. What would be the most practical and economical way of going about this while saving time and money? Would the bales still need to have the stucco on them?
Q: Would it help if there was a space between the bales and the siding? And that space vented into the attic space.
Q: Mr. Hart writes: "Breathability is virtually essential with straw bale walls, or the risk of rot from accumulated moisture is too great... Wood framed or sheathed buildings are trickier to make breathable without jeopardizing the wood to rot from moisture; careful ventilation must be provided." Hence my "double" problem: I would like to "wrap" an existing wooden structure (a 11x16ft garage) with straw bale for insulation! My issues are: 1- painting (sealing?) the wood surface (interior?/exterior?) ecologically 2- breathability: leaving a gap between the wood wall and bales? putting up a vapor barrier? "finishing" of the bales at interface of walls, roof and windows).
A: (Jeff Ruppert) Ideally, you would be able to create a gap between plastered bales and the siding, in essence, creating a rain screen. Not knowing your location, I must assume wet conditions, and therefore recommend separating the plastered bales from the siding. If you live in a relatively dry climate, you will still need to make sure all of the exposed bale surface is plastered with at least one coat of plaster. One way of doing this is to dip the bales in plaster (on the siding face) as they are placed. The reasons for this are many. First, insulation values are preserved by the lack of convection loops on the bales themselves. Second, you keep out bugs and rodents who like straw - this is very important! The third reason is to reduce fire danger. Fire will climb along the siding and bale interface if no plaster is present.
Q: I recently purchased a straw bale home built in 2000 in the Sonoran high desert of southern Arizona. We receive about 15" of rainfall a year, most of it in July and August. Lots of sunny dry weather the rest of the time! Unfortunately, the builders did not tint the concrete/stucco exterior coating; it is a rather dreary gray. I would prefer a terra cotta color in keeping with the natural tint of the soil in the area. Would it be appropriate to paint the exterior, given our relatively dry climate? What about elastomeric paint to minimize the appearance of cracks? Would you recommend another technique, possibly using the (sandy) soil itself as a tint?
A: (Jeff Ruppert) You could possibly use the soil on-site in the form of an earthen plaster, but you would need to use a bonding agent to make sure it bonded well to the cement base coats. Another option is to spray the existing plaster with muriatic acid to achieve a rust color. This is probably your cheapest option. I would suggest experimenting prior to doing it. I would lean against paint, but given your climate I don't think it would cause serious issue. I might add that another option could be to have a "color coat" of stucco applied to the currently gray surface. It sounds to me as though the stucco job was never completed. These color coats come in a wide range of tonalities. I would advise against elastomeric paint, as this would completely eliminate the breathability of the wall, which is not good for strawbales.
Q: The problem is, this will be the first straw bale building in the city of San Diego. And while they have allowed straw bale (non-load bearing) they have balked at our plans for adobe plaster, covered by a lime slip, on the outside of the bales. I've done the testing here, and the results are quite water tight (and vapor permeable), but that's not good enough for them. We need help convincing them that this a reasonable thing to do. We need literature, web links, test results and examples of municipalities who have accepted similar external coverings for straw bale walls. Any help you can provide will be very much appreciated.
A: Here are two links that should be of help: Ecological Building Network - ecobuildnetwork.org
CASBA - California Straw Building Organization -strawbuilding.org (This is the main strawbale organization in California. They've also been active in testing earthen plasters on strawbale walls.
Q: This question is about real-world insulative properties of strawbale, though it may be applicable to general construction materials as well...In an attempt to understand energy efficient building designs and materials (being new to design and construction), I read that strawbale construction can have up to an R-49 rating (bales stacked on edge). I've also read that strawbale construction makes for a very breathable home, providing upwards of 3 air exchanges per hour (this with proper construction). Both of these statistics are cited in the book "The Straw Bale House."
What I'd like to know is this: how can a building that has upwards of 3 air exchanges per hour (with no mechanical assistance/technology) be energy efficient? What difference does it make what insulative values that a home has if it has a high rate of air exchanges per hour? NOTE: The authors of the book "The Straw Bale House" state that the upper limits of strawbale homes range from 1.5 to 3.0 air exchanges per hour for homes using only plaster finishing- no (non-natural) vapor barriers (which don't appear to be desirable with/in strawbale construction).
Air exchanges: you can make a strawbale house as air tight or as leaky as you want. It all depends on how much effort goes into detailing the gaps around doors and windows, how much ceiling insulation there is, caulking, etc. And yes, you want to use vapor permeable finishes. Another factor is internal mass in thick plaster, stone floors, etc. This mass helps moderate the internal temperature, giving strawbale added energy efficiency not shown in some tests.
C: More research has given me better insight into the insulative factors at play. I now realize that stick-frame buildings' insulative efficiencies are strongly compromised due to the studs: I recently got an infrared temperature/heat gun, it really tells the story! With regard to air exchange numbers, given a fixed rate for both a strawbale and a stick-frame home, am I safe to assume that a strawbale home's energy performance wouldn't be any different that the stick-frame's? Or, perhaps the more (with conductivity playing a part- e.g. studs acting as thermal bridges).
A: Three ACH per hour is very poor performance. Think about it: this means all the air inside the home is replaced by outside air three times every hour! You'd have to almost open the windows to achieve this. Something is wrong. The strawbale homes I've built have ranged from .1 to .4 ACH. These ratings are based on official blower door tests performed by Energy Rated Homes of Colorado - the state-recognized organization that specializes in this type of work.
You said "given a fixed rate for both a strawbale and a stick-frame home, am I safe to assume that a strawbale home's energy performance wouldn't be any different that the stick-frame's?" It would be difficult to get a stick-frame house down to .1 to .4 ACH. Have you stood next to a stud wall on a winter day while the wind was blowing? Whoaa.
The thermal bridging point you made is true. It's also true that fiberglass ratings in the field do not match the ratings under ideal conditions in the lab. An R-19 wall actually measures closer to R-11.
Another point is internal mass. The thick plaster on the inside of straw bale walls has been shown to play a significant role in stabilizing indoor temperatures. This is the flywheel effect. Have you ever noticed how often a forced air heater kicks on in a stick-frame house in the winter? It's cycling on and off almost constantly. This is due partly to the lack of thermal mass and partly to excessive air infiltration.
Q: I am living in a load-bearing hemp bale house built in summer/autumn of 2004, in Ontario, Canada (Winter temps in the -30s, summers hot, but can be rainy). My house is not quite finished. I hope to apply a final exterior coat of tinted stucco this summer (2005), and I'm still busy finishing off the interior. I want some color on the interior walls, but prefer not to go with tinted stucco inside. Are there any paints I can use that will allow the walls to remain breathable? I don't know much about lime washes, but have been told the color rubs off if you touch it. Is this true? What do others use for color on the interior walls of their bale houses?
A: Most commercially available paint has very high embodied energy (the energy required to produce and transport it) at around 61-93 MJ/kg. You may have heard how cement is causing about 7% of global warming due to the large amount of energy needed to produce it. Well, cement has about 5.6 MJ/kg of embodied energy. So paint uses about 10-16 times more energy than cement, plus it's full of toxic chemicals to kill mold, etc. which off-gas into the home.
2. Lime wash with stucco pigments and latex: This is a low cost option that doesn't rub off much. Kelly Hart just used it on the exterior of his house, so he can explain the process in detail. This seems like an excellent choice for durability, resistance to rubbing off and for inhibiting the growth of mold. One minor drawback is the difficulty of getting a perfectly uniform-colored coat. But to me, the slight variation looks natural.
3. Clay paint or aliz: This will likely be the lowest cost option and it is very beautiful. It will rub off, however. Ideally, you would use local clay. Get a book and follow the recipes: Earth Plasters for Straw Bale Homes, by Keely Meagan. The Natural Plaster Book: Earthen, Lime, and Gypsum Plasters, by Cedar Rose Guelberth and Dan Chiras. (One option is to skim through them first at a large bookstore.)
4. Milk paint: Another nontoxic option, but some people have complained of poor coverage. It doesn't appear to be very durable.
Q: We are planning a load-bearing strawbale chicken coup addition in Southern Alberta. I would like to put sheet metal on the outside mounted on 1x4 horizontal straps. Do I need to put some type of material over the bales such as tar paper or should I leave them exposed behind the steel which means that there will be a 3/4" air space? The inside will be covered with stucco or parging.
Q: I am working on a plan for a strawbale home for myself. I am a general contractor and like the concept and hope that the current trend in commercial construction, i.e. LEEDs qualified, trickles to residential. My home will become a model for others to follow, hopefully! I am in New Hampshire and the climate seems viable for the construction of a strawbale in-fill home. I am planning a saltbox timber frame, with hefty over hangs and proper drainage...bla..bla..bla. I am concerned with the exterior. Stucco, earthen clay, Adobe, do not appeal to the local pallet and will not catch on. I want to seal the exterior with plaster and then put on a rain screen with wood shakes or beveled siding. What is the best approach? Can you save time on the plaster coats some how? Is there a best practice for attaching rain screens to plaster? Is the price just not worth it?
A: Your overall design sounds good -- LEEDS standards, wide overhangs, good drainage, regional design.
Q: We live in the foothills of Northern California, and would like to retrofit our house with strawbales. I've read quite a lot about adding to the outside of the structure, but we would like to add strawbales to the inside of the structure. Can we place them next to the drywall that is already existing, then plaster the "new" interior side? Would we need to do anything special to the side next to the drywall to seal it?
A: In your area, you shouldn't have any problems. If you have very high humidity, then there's the risk of mold growing on the paper facing of the drywall. Provide good ventilation at major sources of humidity (kitchen and bathroom) and you should be fine.
A: Don't use tyvec or anything that can hinder the transfer of moisture through the walls. Also, the 15' wrap-around porches will further restrict the amount of light entering the windows. Plan accordingly so you have good daylighting.
Q: I would like your comments on a design that a fellow in Wales used to construct a family home there. (Please see www.simondale.net/house/index.htm) In particular, it appears that he used strawbales to form an earth bermed wall on the back side of the structure. If one used a breathable interior plaster, do you believe this to be feasible?
A: (Kelly) The thing about strawbales is that it is important to allow them to breathe, so that if any moisture does get into the wall it can eventually escape. Vinyl and perhaps the other siding that you mention may not allow enough breathability. Also, the vinyl on the outside will provide a place where condensation may form to make even more trouble. You are much better off with a breathable plaster, such an an earthen plaster, or a stucco with a low proportion of cement in it.
Q: From what I've seen after all my research into straw bale, I still get mixed signals when it comes to the use of non-permeable interior finishes. I would like to know your opinion on whether it is important to have breathability into the house as well as out. Also if this is a straw bale no-no, what about only having such finishes on walls in high moisture areas such as the kitchen and bath?
A: I recommend breathable finishes and high quality fans vented to the exterior in high moisture areas -- kitchen, bathroom, laundry.
Q: My husband and I have been researching and daydreaming about building an earth friendly house for over a decade, and have finally managed to save what we consider an adequate amount of money to begin building. Our final plan has centered on strawbales, (mainly because of the insulation factor and the ease of building), but with a few twists. We live in tornado country, and even when we don't have a full-blown twister spiraling through, we tend to get a lot of straight-line winds (which do a pretty good job of knocking down trees all by themselves!), so we want to cover our bale structure with ferrocement (including the roof). We actually much prefer the idea of lime plaster to cement for a number of reasons (including environmental concerns about cement's high embodied energy) but feel we really need the strength of ferrocement considering our weather conditions. Is it possible that lime plaster alone would be strong enough for this, or can lime plaster be successfully incorporated into a steel mesh framework (as with ferrocement), to produce a similar strength end product?
A: Kelly) With strawbale walls breathability is a very important factor, and most ferrocement is so rich in cement that it is pretty much waterproof (they build cisterns this way). Either lime or a less cement-rich stucco would be better. Any of these can be placed over a wire mesh for reinforcement.
Q: I'm in the process of buying a house that, among other things, I would like to do an internal strawbale wrap. My concern is that the house is made of 100 yr old brick with a crumbling cement stucco. On the interior wall I will do a cob and natural plaster. If I remove the stucco, will this be a sufficient breathable exterior covering for the bales or do I need to create some sort of breathing system for the bales? The straw will be non-load bearing and 14" thick.
A: Remove the crumbling plaster. Leave a 1/2" gap between the bales and brick wall. Provide weep holes at the base for any moisture to drain out. Dip the bales in clay slip to coat the side facing the brick. Use earthen plaster on the bales. Install high quality fans in the bathrooms, kitchen and laundry areas that vent moisture to the exterior.
Q: I have a follow up question regarding the air exchanges per hour (ACH) for straw bale homes. Efficiency Vermont, an independent efficiency 'utility', has data from blower door tests done on roughly 10 straw bale home in Vermont. The 'best' result was an ACH in the low 2's. Most were in the 3's and the worst was in the 6's. You stated in an answer to an earlier post that you have achieved ACH in the 0.1 - 0.4 range. Can you give more details on what it is you are doing to achieve a much tighter home than others have apparently built? Also, is there a larger available list of blow door test results for straw bale homes? As you probably know, the benefit of large R-values in walls that are achievable with straw bale homes rapidly becomes of less and less importance if there is anywhere the infiltration evident in the blower door results measured by efficiency Vermont. Any help or resources you could direct me towards that would help me end up with a tighter home would be greatly appreciated.
A: We went to great lengths to seal the Habitat strawbale houses for the reasons you've mentioned. We bought caulk by the case load and sealed everything, and I mean everything: holes drilled for electrical wires, any penetration to outside walls, electrical boxes, windows, doors, etc. The edges where walls and ceilings join is especially critical. For example, sloppy sheetrock work may leave 1/4" gaps along these edges. The edges are covered with drywall tape, but heat will pass right through this thin paper barrier. Our energy rater was very helpful in tweaking the design and checking everything. They even used smoke to help locate air leaks.
Q: For a future strawbale home project, a two story home made from the frame of a old barn, I would like to use cast stone siding over some of the exterior strawbale walls. Perhaps 7 - 8 feet high along the first story. Would this cause moisture problems? The only information on cast stone about permeability I could find was this: "Cast Stone has a natural permeability which is approximately equal to natural limestone and architectural concrete." Is that good enough? I should mention that I live in a seasonal climate that ranges from frigid winters to hot summers. Does the changing of the seasons require the strawbale walls to breathe more or less?
A: Vapor impermeable barriers such as concrete are not recommended for straw bale walls. If you choose to go this route anyway, coat the exterior bale wall surface with clayey earth and leave about 1/4"-1/2" space between the bales and cast stone to allow any condensation to drip down and out through weep holes. Vent bathroom fans and range hoods to the exterior. Seal the house carefully to reduce air infiltration (and the associated leakage of moisture vapor.) Use a dehumidifier in humid climates.
Q: Is there a method/mix for coating strawbales that has emerged as the most reliable/durable? I've seen lots of different opinions posted on this, but the more I dig, the more it seems that no method prevents even short term cracks from forming. While that's ok, once I have my home, I want to spend the bulk of my time using it, as opposed to repairing it... any thoughts?
A: Most strawbale structures are plastered with lime or cement plaster, or with earth plaster for interiors or on exteriors if you have adequate roof overhangs. There's a large body of knowledge that's been built up and published in The Last Straw journal. I suggest buying one or two of their back issues that focus on plastering (each issue has a theme). Small hairline cracks are not an issue with good design and detailing, such as wide roof overhangs.
Comment: Here is a link to a strawbale dome being built in Germany, using an EPDM liner over it to protect the bales from getting wet: www.minke-strawbaledome.blogspot.com
Response (Kelly): Thank you for letting me know about this interesting project. You did a beautiful job of building this dome. And it looks like you had a lot of fun doing it.
Of course we know well about this problem. On the other hand, I don't know about a design that is really airtight inside and outside (we are going to do a blower door test soon as well) so we don't have a problem of moving air, but only diffusion of vapor. We also will have a ventilation system with heat recovery, and this will considerably lower the moisture content in the dome during winter, probably as low as 30%RH at 20°C. Even at this level there is a risk of moisture as you mentioned, but the absolute moisture content is very low, and we believe the 4-5cm thick clay plaster coat under the liner should be able to absorb and protect the straw.
In summer the hot weather and heating by the sun from the outside and relatively cold inside should let the moisture escape trough the inside. In winter the moisture content in the outer layer will definitely be high, but the temperatures very low, so there should be no risk for mold growth. We plan to open the membrane next year to check on the straw on the outside. And we have 12 sensors to follow different moisture and temperature values.
In this project we wanted to verify the structural integrity of straw bales in a dome construction and use natural materials in a setting that is otherwise close to passive house standard (air tightness, triple glazing, heat recovery etc...). The other big experiment is covering the straw with a non permeable membrane, and done so on purpose. We might have to remove the membrane next year, and do a ventilated membrane construction, but for the moment I think this is going to work out - might change my mind later ... :-)
Thanks for explaining all of this to me; I appreciate your attention to detail. Obviously you are aware of the issues involved, and this a really interesting experiment. I would love to be kept informed of how this all works out over time. Perhaps this is all fully explained at some point in the blog, and I missed it, since I did not read every page. I wouldn't want a casual reader to think that your experiment could be replicated without the controls that you mention.